In re A.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although the trial court “is permitted to receive into evidence and rely on prior court orders . . . [it] cannot abrogate its duty as the finder of ultimate facts and instead rely wholly on . . . previous orders”
• noting that although the trial court \is permitted to receive into evidence and rely on prior court orders . . . [it] cannot abrogate its duty as the finder of ultimate facts and instead rely wholly on . . . previous orders\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re STP
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2010-02-16· cited 11×
• In Re AP
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2006-09-05
• In the Matter of Dd
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-04-17

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In Re JS
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2004-07-20· cited 66×