Skip to main content

In re A.P.

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 743

Syllabus

Civ.R. 60(B); child-support order; jurisdiction; bootstrapping. This court did not have jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appellant did not appeal the trial court's initial denial of his Civ.R. 60(B) motion. Instead, he filed a second Civ.R. 60(B) motion and is challenging the denial of that motion. Appellant is improperly trying to \bootstrap\ the denial of his second Civ.R. 60(B) motion to indirectly and untimely appeal the denial of his first Civ.R. 60(B) motion.

Judges: Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.