In re A.P.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5639
Syllabus
Permanent Custody; Manifest Weight; Responsibilities of Guardian Ad Litem (\GAL\). Trial court's decision to terminate Father's parental rights was not against the manifest weight of the evidence when the child had been in the temporary custody of the agency for 20 months out of a consecutive 22 month period and the trial court determined that granting the motion for permanent custody would be in the best interest of the child. The GAL's late filing of the report was not reversible error when Father consented to the late filing.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- Reichert v. IngersollOhio Supreme Court· 1985-07-17· cited 160×
- Brisco v. U.S. Restoration & Remodeling, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-24· cited 17×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-19· cited 16×
- In re A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-02· cited 9×
- In re Da.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-10· cited 8×
- In re C.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-18· cited 6×
- In re S.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-07· cited 6×
- In re K.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.