Customs and Patent Appeals· 8/18/1977
In re Antonie
Citations
- 559 F.2d 618
- 195 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 6
- 1977 CCPA LEXIS 118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In delineating the invention as a whole, we look not only to the subject matter which is literally recited in the claim in question ... but also to those properties of the subject matter which are inherent in the subject matter and are disclosed in the specification”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin, Customs, Maletz, Markey, Miller, Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2007-03-22· cited 295×
- Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1986-12-05· cited 170×
- In Re Patrick H. O'farrell, Barry A. Polisky and David H. GelfandFederal Circuit· 1988-08-10· cited 140×
- Robert L. Jones and Labrado, Inc. v. Alex HardyFederal Circuit· 1984-02-08· cited 130×
- In Re Merck & Co., IncFederal Circuit· 1986-09-08· cited 82×
- In Re Applied Materials, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 73×
- In Re Lance G. Peterson and Ioannis VasatisFederal Circuit· 2003-01-08· cited 61×
- In Re Michael Geisler, Rudolf Kotter-Faulhaber, Susanne Wuerz and Michael JungFederal Circuit· 1997-07-07· cited 54×
- In Re Gary E. GEIGERFederal Circuit· 1987-04-01· cited 52×
- E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Synvina C.V.Federal Circuit· 2018-09-17· cited 41×
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1989-07-03· cited 40×
- In re BoeschCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1980-03-13· cited 24×
- In re GoodwinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-05-18· cited 16×
- In re YatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-11-05· cited 16×
- In Re Randall J. WrightFederal Circuit· 1988-05-24· cited 15×
- Genentech, Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2020-01-10· cited 13×
- In re deC. KratzCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1979-03-01· cited 11×
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Danbury Pharmacal, Inc.D. Delaware· 1988-08-31· cited 9×
- Scott Paper Co. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.D. Delaware· 1984-09-05· cited 7×
- Promega Corp. v. Novagen, Inc.W.D. Wisconsin· 1997-10-07· cited 7×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re AllerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1955-03-22· cited 52×
- Application of Arthur R. Tomlinson, Harry H. Hall and William F. GeigleCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1966-08-04· cited 30×
- In re KronigCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1976-07-22· cited 25×
- In re DaviesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-04-05· cited 22×
- In re SaetherCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-02-28· cited 8×
- Application of Leslie Frederick WigginsCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1968-10-10· cited 7×
- Application of Chi K. DienCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-02-09· cited 4×
- In re WaymouthCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-06-27· cited 4×
Other cases named In re Antonie
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.