in Re Anthony James, Relator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence was admitted independent of K.S.A. 60-455 and so no limiting instruction required
• when failing to file a cross-petition for review, Court of Appeals' holdings against respondent are settled
• the statutory phrase \under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life\ was challenged as vague
• strong evidence against defendant militates in favor of harmless error determination
• issues not raised on appeal are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).