In re Anonymous No.4 D.B. 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting courts interpret statutes to avoid rendering language “surplusage, . . . void, inert, redundant, or trivial,” or 9 GRUNWALD, et al. v. SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE, et al. Opinion of the Court causing “an absurd result”
• when interpreting a statute, “we presume that the legislature did not intend an absurd result and our construction must avoid such a consequence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).