Skip to main content
· 2/1/1985

In re Anonymous No. 8 D.B. 79

Citations

  • 33 Pa. D. & C.3d 621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant who smuggled marijuana into prison to give to inmate committed racketeering because racketeering enterprise had financial objective even though defendant received no personal financial gain
  • failure to address in answering brief issues raised on appeal “can be considered a confession of error”
  • “In ruling on a party’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court should consider those facts that would be admissible in evidence.”
  • unsworn assertions in a 8 BRODY, et al. v. POLSINELLI Decision of the Court memorandum are not facts to be considered when deciding a motion for summary judgment
  • “‘Generally the “facts” which the trial court will consider as “admissible in evidence” in ruling on a motion for summary judgment are those which are set forth in an affidavit or deposition; an unsworn and unproven assertion in a memorandum is not such a fact.’”
  • trial court should consider only admissible evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mundy, Nix

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.