In re Anonymous No. 51 D.B. 85

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that ICWA’s higher burden of proof did not apply until parent proved child was an Indian child, even though ICWA’s notice provisions had been invoked
• addressing ICWA where DCS’ predecessor “concedes that the notice provision of § 1912(a) had been invoked”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).