Skip to main content
· 5/8/1985

In re Anonymous No. 42 D.B. 84

Citations

  • 35 Pa. D. & C.3d 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Arizona law strikes a balance “to move swiftly when protective action cannot wait, yet grants an opportunity to be heard at a significant time and in a significant manner”
  • recognizing 4 GONZALES v. STATE Opinion of the Court “the practice of a profession is a right, not just a privilege”
  • noting “the administrative process . . . can drag out for month after month,” and “[d]uring this process, a dentist summarily suspended cannot practice dentistry; nor, if the suspension turns out to have been improper, can the dentist’s lost income be restored”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.