In re Anonymous No. 41 D. B. 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statement in Nelson requiring both lights and siren was “pure dictum”
• holding that statement in Nelson requiring both lights and siren was \pure dictum\
• upholding finding of delinquency for unlawful flight where siren not sounded because unnecessary under circumstances
• upholding finding of delinquency for unlawful flight where siren not sounded because unnecessary under circumstances
• holding vehicle need not have activated siren

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).