In Re Angelika Films 57th, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the determination of counsel’s disinterestedness is a fact-specific inquiry” (citing TWI Int’l, Inc. v. Vanguard Oil and Serv. Co., 162 B.R. 672, 675 (S.D.N.Y. 1994))
• stating that “the determination of counsel’s disinterestedness is a fact-specific inquiry”
• stating that “the determination of counsel’s disinterestedness is a fact-specific inquiry”
• stating that “the determination of counsel’s disinterestedness is a fact-specific inquiry”
• finding attorney actions which benefited the principal, who was the sole shareholder of a closely held corporation, put at risk the benefits to the estate previously achieved and was therefore an actual conflict
• “The distinction between ‘potential’ and ‘hypothetical’ conflicts merely confuses the analysis, and several courts have rejected it as artificial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).