C.D. California· 2/24/1995
In Re Angeles Corp.
Citations
- 177 B.R. 920
- 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 211
- 1995 WL 82972
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- debtor had committed bad acts after claimant’s purchase of securities was complete, and 14 IN RE KHAN claims did not arise from the purchase
- “If Congress had wanted to subordinate all claims of security holders to an equity position, regardless of the source of the claim, Congress would have worded Section 510(b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kathleen P. March
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Telegroup, Inc. Baroda Hill Investments, Ltd. Leheron Corporation, Ltd. Kimble John Winter v. Telegroup, IncThird Circuit· 2002-02-15· cited 185×
- Allen v. Geneva Steel CompanyTenth Circuit· 2002-02-27· cited 99×
- In Re Granite Partners, L.P.S.D. New York· 1997-05-14· cited 57×
- Allen v. Geneva Steel Co. (In Re Geneva Steel Co.)Tenth Circuit· 2001-04-04· cited 36×
- In Re Enron Corp.S.D. New York· 2006-05-02· cited 23×
- Zafar Khan v. Kenneth BartonNinth Circuit· 2017-01-23· cited 21×
- Weissmann v. Pre-Press Graphics Co. (In Re Pre-Press Graphics Co.)N.D. Illinois· 2004-03-24· cited 14×
- In Re WorldCom, Inc.S.D. New York· 2005-05-26· cited 13×
- S.N. Phelps & Co. v. Circle K Corp. (In Re Circle K Corp.)S.D. New York· 1996-08-07· cited 8×
- Audre Recognition Systems Inc. v. Casey (In Re Audre, Inc.)S.D. California· 1997-06-11· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Christian Life CenterNinth Circuit· 1987-07-10· cited 58×
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-02-09· cited 34×
- Limited Partners' Committee of Amarex, Inc. v. Official Trade Creditors' Committee of Amarex, Inc. (In Re Amarex, Inc.)W.D. Oklahoma· 1987-06-30· cited 24×
- Laughlin v. HaberfeldeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-01-30· cited 20×
- In Re Thc Financial Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1982-06-14· cited 19×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1983-09-06· cited 15×
- In Re Amarex, Inc.W.D. Oklahoma· 1985-10-18· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.