Skip to main content
· 12/3/2003

In Re Andrx Corporation, Inc.

Citations

  • 296 F. Supp. 2d 1356
  • 2003 WL 23000953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to “entertain [the plaintiffs’ new theory raised for the'first time in response to [the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as it [was] not proper ly before the Court” and citing additional cases for support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ungaro-Benages

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.