In Re Andrew W.
Syllabus
A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to three of her children. The juvenile court terminated on grounds of substantial noncompliance with the permanency plan, persistence of conditions, and failure to manifest an ability and willingness to assume custody or financial responsibility for her children. The court also determined that termination was in her children's best interest. After a thorough review, we agree and affirm.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[n]othing in the definition of affray precludes a defendant so charged from asserting self-defense or defense of another in justification of his conduct”
- addressing common-law crime of affray; \person of common intelligence would have little difficulty understanding\ conduct that law proscribes
- absence of appellate decisions did not remove offense of \ancient provenance\ from common law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.