In re Andresen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that before a party can challenge execution of warrant in forfeiture proceeding, it must establish standing in forfeiture action itself
• “Without standing, the claimant lacks the right to bring any motion, regardless of the basis”
• “[T]he provisions of § 983 are procedural rules for pursuing the forfeiture of seized assets,” not “conditions of subject matter jurisdiction.”
• “[E]xecution of the arrest warrant is specifically excused by the Forfeiture Rules when the property is already in the government’s possessions, custody or control.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).