S.D. Texas· 9/7/2005
In Re Anderson
Citations
- 330 B.R. 180
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1737
- 2005 WL 2207015
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a creditor is normally allowed to provide evidence of secured status after failing to attach proof of perfection of a security interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jeff Bohm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re BradleyS.D. Texas· 2013-07-16· cited 23×
- In Re ParsleyS.D. Texas· 2008-03-05· cited 22×
- In Re PrevoS.D. Texas· 2008-08-07· cited 5×
- In Re HensleyD. Kansas· 2006-03-20· cited 5×
- In re Vivaro Corp.S.D. New York· 2015-11-13· cited 4×
- Arnott v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Arnott)W.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-06-18· cited 3×
- In Re FranchiS.D. Florida· 2011-05-27· cited 3×
- In re Heartland Memorial Hospital, LLCN.D. Indiana· 2012-06-21· cited 1×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 5,239×
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-01-17· cited 1,144×
- Michigan v. CliffordSupreme Court· 1984-01-11· cited 346×
- Rogers v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceFifth Circuit· 1999-03-02· cited 251×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1983-09-01· cited 229×
- In the Matter of William J. Stoecker, Debtor. Appeal of Thomas E. Raleigh, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of William J. StoeckerSeventh Circuit· 1993-12-14· cited 148×
- Ashford v. Consolidated Pioneer Mortgage (In Re Consolidated Pioneer Mortgage)Ninth Circuit· 1995-02-27· cited 105×
- In Re Daniel R. Bucknum, Dba Bucknum, Levine & Smith, Debtor. Joe W. Moody, Bernice H. Moody v. Daniel R. Bucknum, Dba Bucknum, Levine & SmithNinth Circuit· 1991-12-09· cited 99×
- Davis v. Kentucky Finance Cos. Retirement PlanSixth Circuit· 1989-10-12· cited 87×
- Matter of BeardN.D. Indiana· 1990-04-03· cited 77×
- In the Matter of Charles Simpson Christopher, Debtor. Sequa Corporation v. Charles Simpson ChristopherFifth Circuit· 1994-08-15· cited 74×
- In Re ArmstrongN.D. Texas· 2005-01-18· cited 61×
- United States v. LamptonFifth Circuit· 1998-10-19· cited 60×
- Osborn v. Ricketts (In Re Ricketts)Ninth Circuit· 1987-10-05· cited 60×
- Ms. Interpret v. Rawe Druck—Und—Veredlungs—GmbH (In Re Ms. Interpret)S.D. New York· 1998-07-14· cited 41×
- Warrick v. Birdsell (In Re Warrick)Ninth Circuit· 2002-05-06· cited 40×
- United States ex rel. McAllan v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2001-04-19· cited 28×
- In Re Schepps Food Stores, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1993-03-02· cited 19×
- Balzotti v. RAD Investments, LLC (In Re Shepherds Hill Development Co.)First Circuit· 2004-11-04· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.