In Re Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The fact that a contract was executed among the parties [pre-petition] is not sufficient basis to hold that the claim arose prior to filing.\
• “The fact that a contract was executed among the parties [pre-petition] is not sufficient basis to hold that the claim arose prior to filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1985-01-04· cited 253×
• Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co.
  Third Circuit· 1984-09-17· cited 81×
• In Re Gull Air, Inc., Debtor. Federal Aviation Administration v. Gull Air, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1989-12-07· cited 47×
• Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Sanyo Electric, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 1983-09-30· cited 45×
• Bellini Imports, Ltd. v. The Mason and Dixon Lines, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1991-09-16· cited 39×
• Matter of Mullarkey
  D. New Jersey· 1987-11-19· cited 30×
• In Re United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1994-04-18· cited 7×
• My Favorite Muffin Too, Inc. v. DK Holdings, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 1999-08-20· cited 4×
• Matter of O'Danny Boy, Inc.
  S.D. Ohio· 1983-12-27· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Weymouth v. York (In Re York)
  D. Maine· 1981-08-26· cited 19×