In re A.N.D., A.N.D., and A.C.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The police are not required to inform the defendant that he is entitled to a telephone call until the defendant is arrested”
• “Police are not required to inform the defendant that he is entitled to a telephone call until the defendant is arrested”
• where judge was aware of mitigating factors, \defense counsel's decision to offer a brief explanation of the defendant's situation was not unreasonable\
• arrival of four police officers at resident’s home did not render consent to enter involuntary
• no interrogation where “defendant’s statement occurred only after and apparently because he had overheard the telephone conversation”
• “defendant’s consent may limit the extent or scope of a warrantless search”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).