Skip to main content
· 6/17/1982

In Re an Application to Quash a Subpoena Duces Tecum in Grand Jury Proceedings

Citations

  • 56 N.Y.2d 348
  • 437 N.E.2d 1118
  • 452 N.Y.S.2d 361
  • 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that criminal defendant “should not be permitted to assert the victim’s physician-patient privilege as a bar to production of relevant medical records or testimony”
  • “[A] person ... subject to proceedings for having committed crimes against an individual should not be permitted to assert the victim’s physician-patient privilege as a bar to production of relevant medical records or testimony.”
  • “[A] person . . . subject to proceedings for having committed crimes against an individual should not be permitted to assert the victim’s physician-patient privilege as a bar to production of relevant medical records or testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gabrielli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.