In Re American Bridge Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The starting point for analysis (of the mootness issue) is the familiar proposition that 'federal courts are without power to decide questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them.' North Carolina v. Rice
• \In Baker v. Slack
• \'The cardinal principle of statutory construction is to save and not to destroy.' Labor Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp .
• \[ Ex parte ] Bain 's [121 U.S. 1
• holding that a warrant containing the description \white male
• \`Any exhibit attached to a pleading shall be considered a part thereof for all purposes'. Rule 1.130(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).