In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.148 and 9.210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “it is only after considerable experience with certain business relationships that courts classify them as per se violations”
• holding that ASCAP’s practice of issuing blanket licenses should be subject to a rule of reason antitrust analysis
• concluding that \it is only after considerable experience with certain business relationships that courts classify them as per se violations\
• holding that the price-fixing allegation there should be assessed under the rule of reason
• noting that CBS had a “real choice” as to whether it wanted to obtain individual licenses
• holding only that a particular ancillary restraint did not constitute a per se violation of the Sherman Act and remanding for a determination , of the case under a rule of reason analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).