In re Amendment to the Supreme Court Procedures Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address a claim when the appellant did not develop a cogent argument or cite to any authority to support it
• declining to address a claim when the appellant did not develop a cogent argument or cite to any authority support it
• we need not address claim where appellant “did not develop a cogent argument or cite to any authority to support it[.]”
• \It is well settled that anticipated profits are too speculative and uncertain to be recoverable.\
• finding projected sales too speculative to award lost profits
• discussing burden for demonstrating expected profits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).