In Re: Amendment of Rules 219(d)(2), (f), (h)(2), (j)(1) and (2), and (k) of PaRDE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the proper application of one enhancement rendered any error in the application of another harmless “because, even without that enhancement, the statutory maximum would cap the Guidelines range”
• reasoning that the “intended to promote” prong applies where a defendant acts with a purpose or goal to bring about a federal crime of terrorism, even if that defendant has not conspired or attempted to commit the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).