In re Amanda B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A careful reading of all cases cited by the defendant shows that the defendant is attempting to create a right that has never been recognized, guaranteed, or required under any statute or constitutional mandate whether state or federal. Arizona v. Youngblood, [488 U.S. 51 (1988
• capital defendant not entitled to additional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).