In re A.M.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2028
Syllabus
CHILDREN – CUSTODY: The trial court did not err in awarding permanent custody of the child to the Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services and terminating mother's parental rights where the record demonstrated that the juvenile court considered the appropriate factors and the evidence supported the court's decision. [But see DISSENT: Where the magistrate's and the trial court's decisions terminating mother's parental rights presented required findings on only three of the five obligatory best-interest factors, and evidenced legal error on the final factor, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for the juvenile court to make the proper findings of fact and conclusions of law.]
Judges: Mock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re A.M. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-11-03· cited 37×
- In re R.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-28· cited 8×
- In re L.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-06· cited 4×
- In re L.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-10· cited 4×
- In re E.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-28· cited 4×
- In re B.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-07· cited 3×
- In re J/B ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-24· cited 2×
- In re ROhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-31
- In re D.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.