In Re AM

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining a parent must rebut a presumption in a termination proceeding by introducing sufficient evidence to the contrary of the presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Quiana M. B. v. State Department of Family Services
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2012-08-30· cited 42×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Arthur H.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2004-10-28· cited 371×
• Stalder v. Stone
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1952-05-22· cited 105×
• People v. Jonathan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-11-14· cited 44×
• People v. Dorothy W.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-10-17· cited 34×
• In Interest of BR
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-07-26· cited 24×
• In Re JA
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-09-15· cited 21×
• In Re VO
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-11-14· cited 19×
• In Re GL
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-04-08· cited 14×
• Eisenberg v. Industrial Com'n of Illinois
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-02-18· cited 10×
• King v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-13· cited 7×
• In Re Cheyenne S.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-01· cited 7×
• People v. J.T.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-05-24· cited 1×