Skip to main content
· 6/28/2004

In Re Alva

Citations

  • 92 P.3d 311
  • 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 811
  • 33 Cal. 4th 254
  • 2004 Daily Journal DAR 7751
  • 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5720
  • 2004 Cal. LEXIS 5968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, after the events at issue in this case, that misdemeanor sex offender registration is not cruel or unusual punishment because sex offender registration is not punishment
  • describing California’s sex-offender registration statute as a “regulatory measure! ]” that is “designed to assist law enforcement and to protect the public”
  • “We see no basis to find a different meaning of ‘punishment’ 12 for state purposes than would apply under the Eighth Amendment.”
  • “[W]e conclude that California’s law requiring the mere registration of convicted sex offenders is not a punitive measure subject to either state of federal proscriptions against punishment that is ‘cruel’ and/or ‘unusual.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.