In re Alonso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a private right of action exists under the ECD Law
• finding implied private right of action and reversing district court’s grant of motion to dismiss on claim for violation of state 911 statute
• finding the plaintiffs had an implied private right of action when they were intended beneficiaries of the statute, there was no “compelling indication” of legislative intent, and the statute had no mechanism for governmental enforcement
• “The 911 Law created municipal corporations for each county, i.e., Emergency Communications Districts (‘Districts’), to run the 911 programs, specifically including the call centers that receive and route the 911 emergency calls to the proper emergency service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).