Skip to main content
· 3/16/2004

In Re Allied Digital Technologies, Corp.

Citations

  • 306 B.R. 505
  • 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 291
  • 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 204
  • 2004 WL 504268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where an insurance policy provides exclusive coverage to directors and officers, courts have generally held that the proceeds are not property of the estate
  • emphasizing that the policy only provides indemnification coverage to the extent that the debtor “has indemnified the Directors and Officers of such Loss....”
  • finding that the Trustee had made no credible showing that the direct coverage under the policy had any continuing vitality
  • stating that whether proceeds of directors and officers’ policies are property of the estate is “controlled by the language and scope of the policy at issue”
  • stating that the cases examining whether the proceeds of D & O policies are property of the estate “are controlled by the language and scope of the policy at issue not by broad, general statements”
  • authorizing the payment of defense costs under a D & 0 Policy over the objection of a trustee who sought to preserve policy proceeds to satisfy his own claims against the insureds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles G. Case

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.