Skip to main content
D. Delaware· 3/16/2004

In Re Allied Digital Technologies, Corp.

Citations

  • 306 B.R. 505
  • 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 291
  • 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 204
  • 2004 WL 504268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where an insurance policy provides exclusive coverage to directors and officers, courts have generally held that the proceeds are not property of the estate
  • emphasizing that the policy only provides indemnification coverage to the extent that the debtor “has indemnified the Directors and Officers of such Loss....”
  • finding that the Trustee had made no credible showing that the direct coverage under the policy had any continuing vitality
  • stating that whether proceeds of directors and officers’ policies are property of the estate is “controlled by the language and scope of the policy at issue”
  • stating that the cases examining whether the proceeds of D & O policies are property of the estate “are controlled by the language and scope of the policy at issue not by broad, general statements”
  • authorizing the payment of defense costs under a D & 0 Policy over the objection of a trustee who sought to preserve policy proceeds to satisfy his own claims against the insureds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles G. Case

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.