In Re Alfredo Canedo v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the mere fact that the Tribe has appeared on behalf of [individual tribal members whom the State of Washington sued in its courts] does not effect a waiver of sovereign immunity for the Tribe itself”
• stating that “individual defendants were members of the Tribe and therefore entitled to the benefits of the Treaty”
• stating that “it is settled that a state court may not exercise jurisdiction over a recognized Indian tribe”
• “Absent an effective waiver or consent, it is settled that a state court may not exercise jurisdiction over a recognized Indian tribe.”
• “Absent an effective waiver or consent, it is settled that a state court may not exercise jurisdiction over a recognized Indian tribe.”
• assertion of tribal sovereign immunity does not impair authority of State Court to adjudicate rights of tribal members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).