In Re Alex Zletz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]uring patent prosecution . . . claims can be Case: 21-2275 Document: 49 Page: 29 Filed: 01/20/2023 PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. APPLE INC. 11 amended, ambiguities should be recognized, scope and breadth of language explored, and clarification imposed.”
• “An essential purpose of patent examination is to fashion claims that are precise, clear, correct, and unambiguous. Only in this way can uncertainties of claim scope be removed, as much as possible, during the administrative process.”
• “It was incorrect for the Board to read unwritten limitations into claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).