Skip to main content
· 2/9/1990

In Re Albert H. Caldwell, Debtor. James E. Hardin, James C. Hardin, and Ralph Majors, Cross-Appellants v. Albert H. Caldwell, Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 895 F.2d 1123
  • 22 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 379
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1639
  • 20 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 230
  • 1990 WL 9717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the debtor has the burden to establish that a plan should be confirmed based on the criteria in § 1325(a)
  • “The party who seeks a discharge under Chapter 13 bears the burden of proving good faith” under § 1325(a).
  • “Although we consider as a factor what Caldwell did to incur the judgment, it is what he has done since the judgment to avoid paying it that is most important.”
  • “As the proponents of their respective plans, debtors bear the burden of proving that the requisite tests for confirmation outlined in § 1325(a) of the Code have been met.”
  • express exclusion of SSI from income inhibits a court from considering the income and surplus derived from the SSI as part of the good faith analysis
  • “It is not conclusively bad faith for a debtor to seek to discharge a debt incurred through his own criminal or tor-tious conduct, but that factor may be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Nelson, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.