In re A.K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in contrast to child whom DCF sought to place out of state, parents were not entitled to hearing regarding child’s out-of-state placement
• juvenile court appropriately denied parents' protective order petition \on the grounds that it had no authority to interfere with SRS's lawful placement of a child in its custody\
• juvenile court appropriately denied parents’ protective order petition “on the grounds that it had no authority to interfere with SRS’s lawful placement of a child in its custody”
• failure to raise even a constitutional issue can result in waiver
• failure to raise issue before the trial court results in waiver
• failure to raise even a constitutional issue can result in waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re B.F.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-06-14· cited 10×
• In re M.M.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-07-17· cited 5×
• O'Brien v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-02-07· cited 2×
• In Re AK
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-12
• In Re BF
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-06-14
• In Re MM
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-07-17
• In re S.R., Juvenile
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-03-26
• In re J.B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Mullestein
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-06-12· cited 43×
• Sinhogar v. Parry
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-06-18· cited 38×
• Eason v. Welfare Commissioner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-09-21· cited 17×
• In Re Green Mountain Power Corp.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-14· cited 17×
• In Re Burlington Housing Authority Declaratory Ruling 124
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-04-21· cited 8×