Skip to main content
· 5/21/1998

In Re Air Bag Products Liability Litigation

Citations

  • 7 F. Supp. 2d 792
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7940
  • 1998 WL 279237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, under Texas law, the “plaintiffs’ failure to demonstrate or, even allege, manifest injury or defect shatters an essential element of all them tort and implied warranty claims”
  • deciding issue of standing to sue for Texas breach-of-warranty claims in federal court and making no reference to Texas precedent on standing to sue
  • recognizing claim for breach of implied warranty of merchantability requires that the alleged defect has or would manifest itself during the product’s normal use
  • explaining that under Texas law a merchantability claim must include an allegation that a vehicle component “functioned improperly under normal use”
  • recognizing claim for breach of implied warranty of merchantability requires that the alleged defect has or would manifest itself during the product = s normal use
  • dismissing all claims for lack *Page 630 of injury, where plaintiffs claimed that air bags were \dangerously defective\ because they deployed with excessive force

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.