In re A.H.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2708
Syllabus
PARENTAL TERMINATION — PERMANENT CUSTODY — BEST INTEREST — LEGALLY SECURE PLACEMENT — LEGAL CUSTODY: The juvenile court's judgment (1) granting permanent custody of the child to the child services agency was not supported by clear and convincing evidence, and (2) denying appellant-aunt's motion for legal custody was not supported by a preponderance of the evidence, where the evidence established that appellant-aunt could provide a secure placement without a grant of permanent custody based on an approved home study for placement, her prior experience as a foster parent, and her testimony establishing that she had strong protective instincts, and the juvenile court's findings that aunt minimized the child's mother's substance abuse was based on speculative testimony.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-02· cited 56×
- In re K.W.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Highland County· 2018-04-30· cited 37×
- In re B.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-10· cited 11×
- State v. KitzilkayaOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-03· cited 11×
- In re D.V.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-30· cited 9×
- In re E.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-27· cited 6×
- In re K.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-27· cited 4×
- In re M.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-04· cited 3×
- In re B.R.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.