In re A.F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s determination that appellant’s movements — walking away from officers, then returning and sitting in the passenger seat of a parked car — were too ambiguous to constitute “evasive action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Golden v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-04-15

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• United States v. Sokolow
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
• Illinois v. Wardlow
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
• Peay v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-10· cited 128×
• Upshur v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-07-30· cited 22×
• In re D.A.D.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-21· cited 10×
• In re A.S.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-26· cited 8×