In Re Advisory Opin. to Atty. Gen. English

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the difference in terminology between the text and the summary did not reasonably mislead even ‘‘[t]hough [the] meanings [of ‘implement’ and ‘enforce’] are not precisely the same”
• holding that the difference in terminology between the text and the summary did not reasonably mislead even “[t]hough [the] meanings [of ‘implement’ and ‘enforce’] are not precisely the same”
• use of synonymous terms will not render summary fatally defective where the use of different terms could not reasonably mislead voters
• use of the phrase “to implement this article ” in the ballot summary not misleading where the text of the proposed amendment actually provided “to enforce this section” (alteration in original)
• provision for legislative implementation directly connected to establishing English as official state language
• provision for legislative implementation directly connected to establishing English as official state language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).