Skip to main content
· 6/30/1992

In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics Opinion 621

Citations

  • 608 A.2d 880
  • 128 N.J. 577
  • 1992 N.J. LEXIS 397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting per se rule and adopting case-by-case approach with respect to legislative aides representing private interests, stressing “the circumstances of the situation” and “a combination of factors of enormous variety”
  • rejecting per se rule and adopting case-by-case approach with respect to legislative aides representing private interests, stressing \the circumstances of the situation\ and \a combination of factors of enormous variety\
  • “We recognize that there has been controversy surrounding the imposition of the ‘appearance of impropriety’ standard and that it is not universally accepted. Nonetheless, our adoption of RPCs that explicitly impose that standard makes clear that it still applies in New Jersey”
  • 5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned
  • 5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilentz, Clifford, Handler, O'Hern, Stein, Pressler, Gruccio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.