· 5/2/1994
In Re A.D.S.T., Inc.
Citations
- 169 B.R. 64
- 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1621
- 1994 WL 319567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that, to be successful on a subrogation claim, the debt paid by the subrogee must not be one for which he was primarily liable
- finding that claimant who voluntarily cashed employee payroll checks of a debtor was not a subrogee because it was under no legal obligation to cash the checks
- finding that a market which cashed customers’ payroll checks to be assignee of customers’ claims because market “was under no legal obligation to cash the employee’s payroll checks, and was acting as a volunteer in doing so.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jim D. Pappas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.