Skip to main content
· 5/2/1994

In Re A.D.S.T., Inc.

Citations

  • 169 B.R. 64
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 1621
  • 1994 WL 319567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, to be successful on a subrogation claim, the debt paid by the subrogee must not be one for which he was primarily liable
  • finding that claimant who voluntarily cashed employee payroll checks of a debtor was not a subrogee because it was under no legal obligation to cash the checks
  • finding that a market which cashed customers’ payroll checks to be assignee of customers’ claims because market “was under no legal obligation to cash the employee’s payroll checks, and was acting as a volunteer in doing so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim D. Pappas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.