Skip to main content
· 3/18/1999

In Re Adoption of Walgreen

Citations

  • 710 N.E.2d 1226
  • 186 Ill. 2d 362
  • 238 Ill. Dec. 124
  • 1999 Ill. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the need to make an authoritative determination for future guidance of public officers questionable where the law at issue was not in disarray nor was there conflicting precedent
  • when the resolution of a question of law cannot affect the result of a case as to the parties, the question is moot
  • when the resolution of a question of law cannot affect the result of a case as to the parties, the question is moot
  • a court should not resolve a moot question merely for the sake of setting a precedent to govern potential future cases
  • “The existence of a real controversy is a prerequisite to the exercise of our jurisdiction”
  • a court should not resolve a moot question merely for the sake of setting a precedent to govern potential future cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.