In re Adoption of M.M.R.
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7222
Syllabus
The trial court's conclusion that biological mother failed to provide maintenance and support for her child was not an abuse of discretion and its determination that there was no justifiable cause for such failure was not against the manifest weight of the evidence biological mother's consent to the child's adoption was not required. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding plaintiff failed to show an imminent injury because the chance the TSA would screen him un- constitutionally was “entirely too speculative”
- finding—while subjected to challenges—the settled law in the Eleventh Circuit is “to preclude compensatory and punitive damages for any claim absent physical injury”
- “[I]f we have been presented with ‘facts beyond the four corners’ of the pleading that are relevant to the question of standing, we may consider them.”
- “While we typically confine our standing analysis to the four corners of the complaint, we may look beyond it when we have before us facts in the record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.