Skip to main content
· 8/16/2021

In re Adoption of M.L.

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2805

Syllabus

The trial court correctly concluded that, under R.C. 3107.07(K), respondent-appellant's consent to the adoption of his daughter by petitioner-appellee is not required. Consequently, the trial court did not err by granting petitioner-appellee's motion for summary judgment.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mere surprise caused by the Commonwealth’s failure to disclose evidence in a timely fashion is not sufficient to warrant a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.