Skip to main content
· 4/19/2006

In Re Adoption of KBH

Citations

  • 206 S.W.3d 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to “read ambiguity” into this ground based on the possibility that the convicted parent may not fully serve the imposed sentence
  • rejecting a father’s argument that the possibility of parole should prevent application of a similar ground for termination, now found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(6)(A), because the statute is silent on that issue
  • “There is no requirement that the trial court make a written finding on each of the enumerated Section 36–1–113(i) factors.”
  • “At the time the statute was enacted, the legislature was certainly aware of parole and other means by which a prisoner could end up released from his or her incarceration prior to expiration of the full sentence, and did not include such circumstances in the language of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holly M. Kirby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.