Skip to main content
· 3/30/2000

In Re Adoption of Copeland

Citations

  • 43 S.W.3d 483
  • 2000 WL 336665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that termination proceeding involves an adjudication of status and does not require minimum contacts over parents
  • holding that termination proceeding involves an adjudication of status and does not require minimum contacts over parents
  • concluding that the elements of the statute were satisfied when father was convicted and the possibility of parole did not alter that conclusion
  • holding that termination is a custody proceeding within the meaning of the UCCJA because it “determines whether a parent will retain custodial rights of his or her child”
  • holding that termination is a custody proceeding within the meaning of the UCCJA because it “determines whether a parent will retain custodial rights of his or her child”
  • “The statute is silent as to the possibility of parole, and we decline to read any intent on the part of the legislature to account for a mere possibility of early discharge from prison.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.