In Re Adoption of B.R.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding foster parents did not have standing to file a termination petition; foster parents could not establish in loco parentis status, where the child’s biological father did not agree to the child’s permanent placement with foster parents or the agency
• observing that the foster parents qualified as prospective adoptive parents, but this status did not enable them to file their own petition to terminate a parent’s rights; this status only allowed them to challenge the removal of the child from their care
• observing that the foster parents qualified as prospective adoptive parents, but this status did not enable them to file their own petition to terminate a parent’s rights; this status only allowed them to challenge the removal of the child from their care
• “Accordingly, we find the provision of a defective Act 91 notice does not deprive the courts of subject matter jurisdiction, and we remand this case to the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).