In re Adoption of A.R.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that Harvey Aluminum “has been criticized and is now against the weight of the authority”
• acknowledging that Harvey Aluminum “has been criticized and is now against the great weight of authority[,]” and that its holding was unnecessary to the disposition of the underlying case
• stating that the covenant of good faith \should not be implied as a modification of an employer's right to terminate an at-will employee because even a whimsical termination does not deprive the employee of benefits expected in return for the employee's performance\
• “[i]n all respects here relevant, a Rule 15(a) amendment eliminating a claim is the same as a Rule 41(a) voluntary dismissal of the claim”
• “Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 203 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1953)[,] stated that Rule 41(a
• implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing prevented employer from terminating plaintiff for the purpose of avoiding the payment of commissions which are otherwise owed the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).