In re A.D.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2346
Syllabus
CHILDREN — PERMANENT CUSTODY — R.C. 2151.414(D) — R.C. 2151.414(E)(10): The evidence before the trial court was sufficient to find, by clear and convincing evidence, that a grant of permanent custody to Hamilton County Job and Family Services was in the child's best interest where the evidence showed that the child had significant special needs and showed that father had few visits with the child, had not attended any of the child's medical appointments or become involved in the child's care, and had not taken any affirmative steps to learn about the child's special needs or how to care for the child.
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
- In re W.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-28· cited 70×
- In re D.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-10· cited 19×
- In re D.V.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-30· cited 9×
- In re H.R.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-03· cited 8×
- In re R/G ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.