In Re AD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Legislature was free to adopt new remedies for collecting delinquent child support -. •,. and to apply those remedies in cases in which the court’s enforcement power had lapsed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• in the Interest of J.C.K., a Minor Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-05-12· cited 40×
• Sprouse v. Sprouse
  Texas Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 5×
• in the Interest of R. D. and E. D., Children
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-04-10· cited 3×
• Dise v. Dise
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-05-03

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Abell
  Texas Supreme Court· 1981-03-18· cited 225×
• Baker Hughes, Inc. v. KECO R. & D., INC.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2000-01-06· cited 177×
• Tamez v. Tamez
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-02-13· cited 64×
• Harrison v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-23· cited 35×
• In the Interest of A. D.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2002-04-11· cited 35×
• In the Interest of S.C.S.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-05-31· cited 31×
• In the Interest of Kuykendall
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1997-11-20· cited 28×
• Ex Parte Wilbanks
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1986-12-15· cited 19×
• In the Interest of M.J.Z.
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-03-17· cited 17×
• Sandford v. Sandford
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1987-06-12· cited 15×
• In the Interest of Digges
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-10-07· cited 12×
• In the Interest of C.L.C.
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1988-11-03· cited 10×
• In the Interest of A.D.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-27· cited 10×
• In the Interest of Brecheisen
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-06-04· cited 7×