D. Maryland· 7/26/2005
In Re Acterna Corp. Securities Litigation
Citations
- 378 F. Supp. 2d 561
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14899
- 2005 WL 1750268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if a motive to commit fraud is relevant to scienter, then a lack of motive undermines any such finding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chasanow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationS.D. California· 2010-04-21· cited 29×
- In re Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLCD. Maryland· 2012-06-26· cited 26×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneD. New Mexico· 2013-07-08· cited 24×
- In Re Williams Securities LitigationN.D. Oklahoma· 2007-07-06· cited 20×
- Payne v. DeLucaW.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-05-02· cited 14×
- In Re Intelligroup Securities LitigationD. New Jersey· 2006-12-20· cited 10×
- Glynn v. Edo Corp.D. Maryland· 2009-07-23· cited 9×
- In Re Avista Corp. Securities LitigationE.D. Washington· 2005-10-19· cited 8×
- In Re BearingPoint, Inc. Securities LitigationE.D. Virginia· 2007-09-12· cited 7×
- In Re Compuware Securities LitigationE.D. Michigan· 2005-09-12· cited 6×
- In Re Mutual Funds Investment LitigationD. Maryland· 2007-02-09· cited 1×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroFourth Circuit· 1999-05-14· cited 2,842×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 2,717×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 1,450×
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanSecond Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 1,243×
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
- Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersFourth Circuit· 1997-07-30· cited 801×
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 563×
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanFifth Circuit· 1981-03-09· cited 367×
- Emergent Capital Investment Management, LLC v. Stonepath Group, Inc., Previously Known as Net Value Holdings, Inc., Andrew Panzo and Lee HansenSecond Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 326×
- Suez Equity Investors, L.P. v. Toronto-Dominion BankSecond Circuit· 2001-05-08· cited 265×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2000-08-10· cited 228×
- Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.Second Circuit· 2005-01-20· cited 226×
- R. Richard Bastian, III v. Petren Resources CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1990-01-09· cited 216×
- Franks v. RossFourth Circuit· 2002-12-04· cited 199×
- In Re MicroStrategy, Inc. Securities LitigationE.D. Virginia· 2000-09-15· cited 146×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.