· 12/19/1930
In Re Ackenbach
Citations
- 45 F.2d 437
- 18 C.C.P.A. 769
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “if a previously patented device, in its normal and usual operation, will perform the function which an appellant claims in a subsequent application for process patent, then such application for process patent will be considered to have been anticipated by the former patented- device”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graham, Bland, Hatfield, Garrett, Lenroot
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.